From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.org>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Segment Failure ,while doing lvcreate
Date: Fri Oct 26 07:56:02 2001 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011026075717.B8741@omnifarious.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BD80A4E.9C3E4A3E@carolina.rr.com>; from jedgecombe@carolina.rr.com on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:49:18AM -0400
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1118 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:49:18AM -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> "Eric M. Hopper" wrote:
> > If gcc-2.96-96 doesn't have the problem, RH 7.2 should work just
> > fine.
>
> I suspect that the problem will be in RH 7.2 also.
>
> I was reading the roswell archive and someone from redhat said that all
> 7.x release will be binary compatible, i.e. they all have that buggy
> gcc.
>
> I may be wrong on this though.
Just because it's 2.96 doesn't mean it's buggy. Apparently
their latest version happens to have the same bug, but that didn't
necessarily have to be true. I doubt the bug is an inherent 'feature'
of their calling conventions.
I've actually had a lot of luck with gcc 2.96 fixing problems
for me. But, I'm a C++ developer. :-)
Have fun (if at all possible),
--
"It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --- Thomas Jefferson
"Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain
-- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper) --
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-26 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-25 6:44 [linux-lvm] Segment Failure ,while doing lvcreate David Chang
2001-10-25 7:38 ` Thomas Svedberg
2001-10-25 7:38 ` Jason Edgecombe
2001-10-25 7:44 ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-10-25 7:48 ` Jason Edgecombe
2001-10-26 7:56 ` Eric M. Hopper [this message]
2001-10-25 8:14 ` Markus Dobel
2001-10-26 7:50 ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-10-25 18:36 ` Sean Burford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-26 8:02 Jean-Eric Cuendet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011026075717.B8741@omnifarious.org \
--to=hopper@omnifarious.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox