From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ville Herva Message-ID: <20011112162337.J26218@niksula.cs.hut.fi> References: <20011112130101.A11020@tykepenguin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000 Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] lvm in 2.4.15.pre3 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Nov 12 08:22:02 2001 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alan Cox Cc: Patrick Caulfield , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@sistina.com On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000, you [Alan Cox] claimed: > > Please apply the following patch to LVM in 2.4.13pre3. > > > > It looks like the LVM patch that came from Alan calls alloc/free_kiovec_sz() > > functions which only exist in his tree. > > Just sent Linus the same thing 8) Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I see the LVM in .15pre3 is 0.9.1beta2. Are there plans to merge something newer like 1.0.1pre4? What about Andreas Dilger's fixes? Do they get the pre3 LVM closer to 1.0.1pre4? -- v -- v@iki.fi