From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work? Message-ID: <20011129090508.B1408@tykepenguin.com> References: <3C041A0D.70608@larsshack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C041A0D.70608@larsshack.org> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Nov 29 03:03:02 2001 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:56:13PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > Now that we've solved the pressing oh-my-goodness-my-system-won't-boot > problem, I've got a few other questions. > > The lvm package comes with the nifty lvmcreate_initrd command...but in > my experience it simply doesn't work. While it's especially clever > about resolving library dependencies, it seems to ignore the issue of > kernel modules. Yes it does ignore the issue of kernel modules. It's quite hard for lvmcreate_initrd to know just which modules are needed to get the system booted, though I suppose it's possible. It is recommended that you build the kernel with the drivers needed to mount the root partition compiled in, rather than as modules. I realise this goes against the Red Hat methodology of having everything as a module. patrick