From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" <mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] summary of what I need to do to mount snapshot on XFS
Date: Tue Jan 15 08:19:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020115151621.E11005@sistina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16OSId-0005Vf-00@hermes.sistina.com>; from ahead@bigpond.net.au on Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:38:08AM +1000
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:38:08AM +1000, Adrian Head wrote:
> If this works for you - good. I have had heaps of issues that I have been
> working with various developers and trying to get fixed.
>
> Basically if I used the SGI 2.4.17-xfs kernel with lvm-1.0.1rc4(ish) some
> file systems would work but others would fail. Some would fail on snapshot
> creation, others would fail on snapshot mount and others would fail when the
> snapshot overflowed. When I upgraded LVM to lvm-1.0.1 other filesystems
> issues were fixed but others broke again. Check out the "Unable to get XFS,
> ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily"
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-lvm&m=100994364215110&w=2
> thread on linux-lvm / linux-xfs mail archives and see if any of this relates
> to your problem. With 2.4.17-xfs + lvm-1.0.1 upgrade patch + VFS-lock patch
> ext2/3 & resierfs will operate correctly but XFS will fail at snapshot
> creation. You can do a little source code change and get a XFS snapshot
> created and mounted; but then it will fail on an overfull snapshot. These
> problems are being worked on by myself and the great SGI XFS developers.
>
> The lvm.c change you talk about I assume is the LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT change?
> For some reason when adding the lvm-1.0.1 upgrade patch this disappears from
> lvm.c I have been able to get this to compile with the change but I have
> forgoten what I did.
>
> This is one question I would like answered by the LVM gurus: should #define
> LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT still be there after upgrading to lvm-1.0.1?
Yes.
> What does
> LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT actually do w.r.t lvm-1.0.1rc4(ish) and lvm-1.0.1?
What it did before: compile the VFS lock/unlock calls in.
> I
> know that LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT in older LVM versions was the locking of the
> VFS so that snapshots would be consistant - is this still correct and is it
> still needed?
Yes.
>
> For the "large discussion" you are talking about the "Unable to get XFS,
> ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily" thread - hit me off list and I will
> attempt to summarise it for you.
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:09, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > My issue wasn't so much with how to create the snapshot but how to
> > simultaneously mount the snapshot with the live filesystem. I saw a big
> > thread about having to uncomment from lvm.c, did that but then got
> > unresolved symbols...
> >
> > It seemed as if there were some issues and a large discussion related to
> > doing this with XFS.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -jeremy
>
> --
> Adrian Head
>
> (Public Key available on request.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-08 9:22 [linux-lvm] summary of what I need to do to mount snapshot on XFS Jeremy Hansen
2002-01-09 6:07 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-09 7:04 ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-01-09 14:23 ` Jeremy Hansen
2002-01-09 17:39 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-15 8:19 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen [this message]
2002-01-15 9:10 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-15 11:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-09 14:34 ` Jeremy Hansen
2002-01-10 2:40 ` Anselm Kruis
2002-01-09 14:51 ` Jeremy Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020115151621.E11005@sistina.com \
--to=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox