From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Paralell IO performance with LVM and XFS
Message-Id: <20020118150514.GK1684@tykepenguin.com>
References: <200201171229.g0HCTVe10111@localhost.localdomain>
    <20020117125640.35CF032FDE6@lyta.coker.com.au>
    <20020117152130.GG1066@tykepenguin.com>
    <20020117173959.5BF1F35FA9E@lyta.coker.com.au>
    <20020117175832.GL1066@tykepenguin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020117175832.GL1066@tykepenguin.com>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Fri Jan 18 09:06:01 2002
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 05:58:32PM +0000, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:39:58PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > 
> > Why are you so certain that it's the FC interface at fault?  The FC interface 
> > should be able to do more than 60MB/s.

Just for the record, I can't get more tham 60M/s out of it using MD striping
either.

patrick