From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Weisselberg Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Message-Id: <20020207225807.GA24019@tiger.bigcats.invalid> References: <3C625CCE.1A213D80@lmco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Feb 7 17:05:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Hi, James! James Hawtin (oolon@ankh.org) wrote 45 lines: > The reasons resize scares me, is all in needs is someone to define MB or > GB differently and your up S..T creek, is the block could 1k or 512 > bytes... Was that M option MiB or MB most people say MB whent hey mean > MiB. Was there and "overhead" of a few blocks magically required when i > asked for a 1GiB filesystem... etc. If you are using ext2 or ext3, you might want to look at e2fsadm... -Wolfgang