From: "José Luis Domingo López" <jdomingo@internautas.org>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Manegeability with LVM
Date: Mon Mar 4 16:33:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020304223441.GA3489@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2712663015.20020304230010@tnonline.net>
On Monday, 04 March 2002, at 23:00:10 +0100,
Anders Widman wrote:
> As my need for diskspace increases all the time I was thinking of
> using LVM so I could make use of all diskspace and grow/shrink/replace
> drives as I need to.
>
Take into account that there are filesystem that by design doesn't
support shrinking of filessytems (e.g. XFS). Some others allow you to
both grow and shrink filesystems, but sometimes you will have to unmount
the filesystem before modifying its size.
On the LVM part, it was designed to allow growing and reducing LV sizes
without being necessary to put your machine in some "maintenance" state.
> The only downside to this is the possibility of massive dataloss if I
> loose any of the 14 disks (drive fails to spin etc...). Would it be
> possible to setup up a software redundancy like RAID5 with LVM so I
> can keep this manageability LVM gives me?
>
Remember, nothing except regular _and_ verified backups of your valuable
data can guarantee that your data will survive a hardware _or_ software
error. I'm am not sure what I fear most, a damaged disk or a severe
filesystem corruption. Some RAID levels give you additional hardware
failure protection, but other levels increase your chances of lossing
data. LVM can be seen as some sort of linear-RAID, and as such, usually
increases the probability of a broken disk destroying your data.
In other words, backups are (and will always be) the way to go.
--
Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez
Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.18-rc4aa1)
jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-04 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-04 16:00 [linux-lvm] Manegeability with LVM Anders Widman
2002-03-04 16:33 ` José Luis Domingo López [this message]
2002-03-04 16:45 ` Anders Widman
2002-03-04 18:33 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-03-05 4:41 ` Goetz Bock
2002-03-05 5:28 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-03-05 8:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-05 8:17 ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-03-05 2:29 ` William Blunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020304223441.GA3489@localhost \
--to=jdomingo@internautas.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox