Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim <tim@connectlive.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM/RAID again
Date: Wed Mar  6 17:13:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020306181319.C12548@connectlive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020306203532.GA622@human.galaxy>; from frank.lenaerts@advalvas.be on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:35:32PM +0100

Having used and despised VxVM on Solaris before, and finding out about
Heartbeat since then, I'd look into attached enclosures shared
physically on a SCSI bus (there is an article in SysAdmin magazine that
I used for my starting point) and serial heartbeats across the nodes, if
the cluster is simple enough...  if not post to the linux-HA list :-)


Quoth Frank Lenaerts:
> I've been reading several LVM/RAID postings on this mailinglist to
> find out if someone else is also having the same question as I have,
> but this does not seem to be the case; I hope this is the right place
> to ask this.
> 
> As LVM does not provide RAID1 (etc.) as VXVM does with its plexes, I
> wanted to use LVM on top of the standard Linux metadevices
> (RAID1). However, I wanted to do this for a cluster system using a
> shared SCSI bus. I am aware of the fact that ownership of disks is
> important, while something like LVM actually tries to abstract this
> away, but I want to use LVM to be able to extend the filesystem, to
> take snapshot backups etc.. The problem I currently face however, is
> the fact that both nodes autodetect the metadevices and start syncing
> the mirrors, independently of each other (I do not have the LVM and
> cluster software installed on these machines yet). The synchronization
> however, is initiated by the raidstart command, that is true (it is
> not the detection itself which does this), but I wonder how I should
> solve this problem. Below, some ideas that come to my mind:
> 
> - do not use LVM at all, just use the physical disks instead
> 
> - have two separate raidtab files where each of them is only "owned"
>   by a single node (to prevent syncing problems) and only start the
>   raid for a certain metadevice when a logical volume is imported on a
>   node
> 
> What do you think about this?
> 
> -- 
> frank.lenaerts@advalvas.be



-- 
     "To be suspended from the legal profession is the moral equivalent of 
      being ostracized by child molesters."
                                                           --Ian Rowan

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-06 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-06 14:35 [linux-lvm] LVM/RAID again Frank Lenaerts
2002-03-06 17:13 ` Tim [this message]
2002-03-06 18:16 ` Luca Berra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020306181319.C12548@connectlive.com \
    --to=tim@connectlive.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox