From: Wolfgang Weisselberg <weissel@netcologne.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] mount reiserfs snapshot failed
Date: Thu Apr 18 08:07:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020418130718.GA30701@tiger.bigcats.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020418094402.GA1233@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk>
Hi, Joe!
Joe Thornber (joe@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk) wrote 31 lines:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:33:31AM +0200, Markus Bartl wrote:
> > Im using the original kernel 2.4.18 with the locking patch and the
> > lvm-patch applied. I use the lvm in Version 1.1rc1.
> > In some cases mounting the snapshot volume fails with error 32 (wrong fs
> > type or bad superblock).
> Do version 1.0.3 tools fail in the same way ?
I am running a similar configuration:
Kernel 2.4.18-rc4
+ LVM 1.0.3
+ linux-2.4.18-VFS-lock.patch
+ sched-O1-2.4.18-pre8-K3.patch
I use ext3, and the LVM 1.0.3-tools + LVM-1.0.3-pmove-patch
Snapshots work.
I upgrade to 2.4.19-pre6, must merge the VFS-lock.patch by hand
and drop the sched-O1-* patch; and use the LVM 1.1rc1-Tools:
Snapshots get generated, but first some (depending on the
order of generation!), later all of them are unreadable (even
a simple cat fails complaining about that), so mount fails.
I decide this might be due to a bad merge on my side or a
kernel problem, so I downgrade to:
Kernel 2.4.18-rc4
+ LVM 1.1rc1
+ linux-2.4.18-VFS-lock.patch
+ sched-O1-2.4.18-pre8-K3.patch
LVM 1.1rc1-Tools.
Snapshots still unreadable.
I downgrade the Kernel to LVM 1.0.3:
Kernel 2.4.18-rc4
+ LVM 1.0.3
+ linux-2.4.18-VFS-lock.patch
+ sched-O1-2.4.18-pre8-K3.patch
but still with LVM 1.1rc1-Tool
Snapshots still show the same problems as before.
Downgrading to LVM 1.0.3-tools on the running system:
everything works again.
-Wolfgang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-18 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-18 4:36 [linux-lvm] mount reiserfs snapshot failed Markus Bartl
2002-04-18 4:43 ` Joe Thornber
2002-04-18 5:56 ` Markus Bartl
2002-04-18 7:14 ` Xavier Montagutelli
2002-04-18 6:39 ` Markus Bartl
2002-04-18 7:05 ` Chris Mason
2002-04-18 8:07 ` Wolfgang Weisselberg [this message]
2002-04-19 8:13 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020418130718.GA30701@tiger.bigcats.invalid \
--to=weissel@netcologne.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox