Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim <tim@connectlive.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] offtopic but ...
Date: Wed May  8 08:23:02 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020508082357.B18631@connectlive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205081502560.3518-100000@diablo.unixag-zw.fh-kl.de>; from jovi@unixag-zw.fh-kl.de on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:12:45PM +0200

> Hehe Tim,
> 
> that was fast, but as i told little bit lower in the email I dont want to
> put everything in a RAID. The RAID controller isnt the problem if you buy
> me a further 160GB Maxtor i will buy the RAID contoller or do
> software-RAID. ;-)

Fair enough.  Personally (having to do this at work) I feel like an IDE
enclosure or a hardware RAID card is a relatively small investment in
data security, but then again, the 500GB I have live right now is not
content that I can tolerate data loss on.  We probably should not use
IDE drives for it at all, except that it is replicated onto a whole
steaming mess of SCSI drives, also RAIDed up... 

I think your requirements are different than the ones I am used to.


> The goal is simply to combine more diskspace+more security then just a
> LVM+one logical unit (mountpoint/device where you dont have to care all
> the time
> how the data gets stored and where)+better usage of the diskspace (you
> dont have on the one everything free and the other is halffull.

Makes sense, but I'm not sure how one would dynamically reallocate
parity information while everything is in-flight (eg. live).


> Or just imagine you would like to have 500gb and have only 4x3,5 slots to
> build the harddrives in and the maximum size is at the moment 160GB. How
> would you do it and you would give up some security for the advantage to
> have more space but not to lose everything if one drive fails.
> And the idea i described in the email below is somehow between a RAID0/LVM
> and a RAID5.

Again, the difference between my requirements and the ones you're
outlining is that I simply call a vendor and order another enclosure
when I need another 500GB.

I think I am beginning to see what your idea is, but the logistics of
having LVM take care of the metadata seem rather daunting.


-- 
    We should take care not to make the intellect our god; 
    it has powerful muscles, but no personality. 

                                        --Albert Einstein 

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-08  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-08  0:03 [linux-lvm] VG wiederfinden Tim-Christian.Hanschen
2002-05-08  6:46 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-05-08  7:44 ` [linux-lvm] offtopic but Oliver Jovic
2002-05-08  7:48   ` Tim
2002-05-08  8:11     ` Oliver Jovic
2002-05-08  8:23       ` Tim [this message]
2002-05-08  9:11         ` Oliver Jovic
2002-05-08 11:20           ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-05-10  8:46           ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-05-08  9:11   ` Christian Limpach
2002-05-08  9:27     ` Steven Lembark
2002-05-13  4:37       ` Harri Haataja
2002-05-13  4:42         ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-05-13  7:37           ` Tim
2002-05-13  9:39             ` Steven Lembark
2002-05-13 10:21               ` Benjamin Scott
2002-05-13 15:32                 ` Goetz Bock
2002-05-13 18:54                   ` Benjamin Scott
2002-05-14  7:17                     ` Goetz Bock
2002-05-14  7:46                       ` Steven Lembark
2002-05-14  8:08                         ` Benjamin Scott
2002-05-14  8:13                           ` Tim
2002-05-13  9:29         ` Steven Lembark
2002-05-13 10:19           ` Benjamin Scott
2002-05-13 10:30             ` Steven Lembark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020508082357.B18631@connectlive.com \
    --to=tim@connectlive.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox