From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0.4 available at www.sistina.com Message-ID: <20020521065251.GB1035@tykepenguin.com> References: <20020502215808.GA492@antimony.sistina.com> <1021940894.3438.20.camel@pslgregory> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1021940894.3438.20.camel@pslgregory> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue May 21 01:53:01 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 05:28:10PM -0700, Gregory Ade wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 14:58, AJ Lewis wrote: > > To clarify, this is a stable release with bugfixes for 1.0.3 only. Try LVM2 > > if you want to track the latest developments in LVM. > > > > LVM 1.0.4 supports both version 1 and 2 of the metadata. > > > > There's *no* need to run any metadata update tools. > > > So, just to be sure, if I have a system that is running LVM 0.91.beta-7, > I can install LVM 1.0.4 without worries? Yes you can. > I'm running a SuSE 7.2 install, which uses that version of LVM & their > own SuSE-fied kernel rpm, but due to other requirements, I'm going to > need to compile my own kernel from virgin sources. I'm going to be > building 2.4.18, specifically with the linux-abi (formerly known as > iBCS) patch, and figured I'd update everything with the latest LVM code > while I was at it. I also remembered that I need the VFS-lock patch, > since I want to do snapshots and we're running ReiserFS. > > Anything I need to beware of, before doing this? Yes, beware that I screwed up with the VFS lock patch and the wrong one is in the 1.0.4 tarball - get the right one from here: http://tech.sistina.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/LVM/PATCHES/linux-2.4.18-VFS-lock.patch?rev=1.1 patrick