From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] 2.5 version of device mapper submission Message-ID: <20021015082152.GA4827@suse.de> References: <1034453946.15067.22.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <1034614756.29775.5.camel@UberGeek.coremetrics.com> <20021014175608.GA14963@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021014175608.GA14963@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Oct 15 04:00:22 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Joe Thornber Cc: Austin Gonyou , linux-lvm@sistina.com, Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Oct 14 2002, Joe Thornber wrote: > 10.patch > [Device-mapper] > Add call to blk_queue_bounce() at the beginning of the request function. What on earth for? I also see that you are setting BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH as the bounce limit unconditionally for your queue. Puzzled. When does dm even have to touch the data in the bio? -- Jens Axboe