From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] strange behavior with 1.0.5 on Linux 2.4.19? Message-ID: <20021101150659.GA5289@weissel.dyndns.org> References: <20021004105057.B8575@sistina.com> <1034107599.28928.105.camel@pslgregory> <20021009133650.E23965@sistina.com> <1035782975.3398.128.camel@gopher> <20021028101739.F16452@sistina.com> <1035866273.9074.74.camel@gopher> <20021029101033.A22193@sistina.com> <1035921224.1276.24.camel@gopher> <20021031134804.A491@sistina.com> <1036104859.21418.104.camel@pslgregory> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <1036104859.21418.104.camel@pslgregory> From: Wolfgang Weisselberg Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Nov 1 09:07:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Gregory Ade (gkade@bigbrother.net) wrote 60 lines: > support and attempt the snapshot creation? Unfortunately, the way the > system was assembled, the smallest I can physically reduce the RAM to is > 4GB (two DIMMS on each memory carrier is the minimum required for the > system to boot, and they shipped it to us with 8 1GB DIMMS.) There should be no problem with "mem=3D1023M" as boot parameter,=20 as long as at least 1023 MB are actually physically available. -Wolfgang