From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" <mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] file system larger than lv
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:32:02 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118162556.C25728@sistina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021115134816.GL8377@pc.ilinx>; from lvm@interlinx.bc.ca on Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:48:20AM -0500
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:48:20AM -0500, lvm@interlinx.bc.ca wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:54:24PM +0100, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
>
> Hi Heinz.
>
> > yes, at the end of the day you can't prevent people with the necessary
> > credentials from shooting themselves in the foot anyways.
> > That occasionally includes me.
> > At least at ~4pm in the morning ;)
>
> I hear ya. Me too. :-)
:)
>
> > Because LVM is a block layer service transparent to filesystems or any other
> > arbitrary block device user, it should just cover the necessary block device
> > functionality.
>
> I don't disagree with that.
>
> > Putting additional overloading block/filesystem layer services not necessarily
> > needed there into the kernel is unlikely to be accepted either IMO.
>
> No. No. Not in the kernel. I mean the user space tools can simply
> check what data is on the block device (i.e. look for a known
> signature of given filesystems) and see if it can determine if it is
> indeed a filesystem.
Yep. We share the same opinion I guess.
The user space tool shall be pattern configurable in order to "learn" about
new filesystem types (config file ala /etc/magic).
>
> > Controlling LVM block device and filesystem changes in userspace with an
> > (e2)fsadm tool is a "helping hand" for the unexperienced, not limiting
> > the experienced user.
> > This is our prefered way to go.
>
> That is fair enough. And I don't care that strongly about this issue,
> but just thought of how many tools (in their "interactive mode"
> anyway) stop and ask a user before they are about to do something
> potentially disasterous.
lvreduce warns.
As mkfs does ;)
>
> b.
>
> --
> Brian J. Murrell
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-14 9:36 [linux-lvm] file system larger than lv Jonathan S. Polacheck
2002-11-15 5:04 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-15 6:28 ` lvm
2002-11-15 7:00 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-15 7:50 ` lvm
2002-11-15 20:00 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-11-18 9:30 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-18 9:32 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021118162556.C25728@sistina.com \
--to=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox