From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0) Message-ID: <20030127124956.GI1698@tykepenguin.com> References: <1043622448.3e346a3057b43@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20030127111301.GD1698@tykepenguin.com> <1043666356.3e3515b44e061@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20030127112714.GE1698@tykepenguin.com> <1043667262.3e35193e470c0@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20030127115012.GG1698@tykepenguin.com> <1043669513.3e3522096e53e@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1043669513.3e3522096e53e@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jan 27 06:51:01 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: > Quoting Patrick Caulfield : > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: > > > > > > do you think it's only xfs related, > > > if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem > > > > I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd assumptions about > > the > > alignment of the journal or something. > > > i'll check later with reiser and jfs > > > > may be i should try this patch: > http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/2.4.leading/2003-01-06:00/015RaidSplit > after i check reiser and jfs > > > > > I've been running reiser over LVM2 for AGES ! > over soft raid-0 ? No, true. I did try it once though :) -- patrick