From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" <mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm2, extending a physical volume
Date: Wed Jul 9 03:05:02 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030709100320.A17130@sistina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F0A9604.5000101@portrix.net>; from j.dittmer@portrix.net on Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:59:32AM +0200
Jan,
you didn't overlook something. There's a bug in the
pvcreate -yff -u wZQg66-cWrF-VDi5-GcRN-aYVg-RQQ3-PPm5K5 /dev/md0
vgcfgrestore myraid
trick we'll fix ASAP (vgcfgrestore should keep the new size which it doesn't).
We're thinking about a pvresize command to make this smoother.
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:59:32AM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted this a while ago on lvm-devel, but received no answer.
> I'm using kernel 2.5(.74-mm2) with LVM2 and have a RAID5 to which I
> added a new disk with raidreconf. This worked fine, but lvm doesn't
> recognize the extra disk space:
>
> # pvdisplay
> --- Physical volume ---
> PV Name /dev/md0
> VG Name myraid
> PV Size 335.36 GB / not usable 0
> Allocatable yes (but full)
> PE Size (KByte) 4096
> Total PE 85853
> Free PE 0
> Allocated PE 85853
> PV UUID wZQg66-cWrF-VDi5-GcRN-aYVg-RQQ3-PPm5K5
>
> but:
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath]
>
> md0 : active raid5 hdc1[4] hdh1[3] hdf1[2] hdg1[1] hde1[0]
> 468872704 blocks level 5, 4k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
>
> which translates to ~480 GB (5x 120GB)
>
> Somewhere I found a post, that with vgcfgbackup / vgcfgrestore one is
> able to resize the volume. But simply backing up and restoring the
> descriptor just gets me to the same situation.
> As I've another partition (which isn't that important) I tried to change
> the backup manually, ie. I changed pe_count in the backup file and
> restored it. This works fine - but how do I figure the correct PE count
> for this bigger disk? I just don't want to poke around until it says,
> 'hey, too big, trashing your data'. There has to be a simple way, I
> guess, which I totally overlook. It isn't that big of a change.
> pvresize tells me it isn't implemented.
>
> Thanks for any insight,
>
> Jan
>
> # vgdisplay --version
> LVM version: 1.95.15 (2003-01-10)
> Library version: 0.96.08-ioctl (2003-03-27)
> Driver version: 1.0.6
>
> --
> Linux rubicon 2.5.74-mm2-jd4 #1 SMP Sun Jul 6 09:55:20 CEST 2003 i686
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-09 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-08 5:00 [linux-lvm] lvm2, extending a physical volume Jan Dittmer
2003-07-09 3:05 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen [this message]
2003-07-12 16:10 ` Jan Dittmer
2003-07-12 18:00 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2003-07-13 3:17 ` Jan Dittmer
2003-07-13 3:27 ` Jan Dittmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030709100320.A17130@sistina.com \
--to=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox