From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Is there a maximum for LV? Message-ID: <20031209220733.U16901@uk.sistina.com> References: <20031209192646.GB4188@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031209192646.GB4188@localhost>; from linux-lvm@24x7linux.com on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:26:46PM +0100 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Dec 9 16:09:01 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > > How I'm testing LVM2. The field "MAX LV Size" is not there anymore. Is this means that LV doesn't have a maximum? Correct: Provided you use the new "lvm2" metadata format, you're limited only by disk space and the maximum device size that your kernel will support. > >From vgcreate(8): > -s, --physicalextentsize PhysicalExtentSize[kKmMgGtT] > So it seems you have a 255 GiB limit on LV sizes with your LVM2 setup. That section now only applies to PVs in "lvm1" format. It needs updating... For tool performance reasons it's still a good idea to use large physical extent sizes for large volume groups. (This will get fixed eventually.) Alasdair -- agk@uk.sistina.com