From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from reti (vpn50-14.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.14]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1IH5Dxn015260 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:05:14 GMT Received: from joe by reti with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AtVBD-0002xu-57 for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:08:11 +0000 From: Joe Thornber Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2: vgscan is long... Message-ID: <20040218170811.GX27549@reti> References: <1077122257.2134.12.camel@xeyrus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1077122257.2134.12.camel@xeyrus> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Feb 18 12:05:19 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:37:38AM -0500, Daniel Ch?nard wrote: > So, 3m41.19 for a vgscan is too long for me. Anybody could help me to > reduce this time?? If you are using 2.6 you could try the latest LVM2 tools from CVS. There is a filter that uses sysfs to speed up vgscan (took a 35 second scan to 2 seconds on my system). - Joe