From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2PNPmj00320 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:25:48 -0500 Received: from shell.blacknet.de (shell.blacknet.de [80.254.131.106]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2PNPlWA002288 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:25:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:17:11 +0100 From: Goetz Bock Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit Message-ID: <20040325231658.GD24286@shell.blacknet.de> References: <005601c412af$748d71a0$1fa0a8c0@blec> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005601c412af$748d71a0$1fa0a8c0@blec> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On Thu, Mar 25 '04 at 16:23, Brad Vrabete wrote: > Is there any was to create a logigal volume larger than 2TB? Can LVM2 > do that? you need to use 2.6.x (or find a patch for 2.4.x) as onty his kernel supports large block devices. Or you might have luck with x86_64 (aka AMD Opterons) -- /"\ Goetz Bock at blacknet dot de -- secure mobile Linux everNETting \ / (c) 2003 as GNU FDL 1.1 X [ 1. Use descriptive subjects - 2. Edit a reply for brevity - ] / \ [ 3. Reply to the list - 4. Read the archive *before* you post ]