From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9S4HPV31877 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:17:25 -0400 Received: from mail.interlix.com (interlix.com [64.22.224.125]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9S4HIAR020873 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:17:18 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.interlix.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EVLfr-0003HS-Jb for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:17:06 -0500 From: Edward Muller Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:17:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5196445.pARXGxEhGW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510272317.02488.edwardam@interlix.com> Subject: [linux-lvm] Can LVM2 and CLVM co-exist Reply-To: edwardam@interlix.com, LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: LVM general discussion and development --nextPart5196445.pARXGxEhGW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have a system using LVM2 and recently setup a CORAID (www.coraid.com)=20 device. I'd like to use CLVM to manage the volumes on the device. But someo= ne=20 mentioned that LVM2 and CLVM may be incompatible.=20 I didn't want to trash my test machine at the moment so I was wondering if= =20 they are compatible or not. Thx =2D-=20 Edward Muller - Interlix edwardam@interlix.com 417-862-0573 PGP Key: http://interlix.com/Members/edwardam/pgpkeys --nextPart5196445.pARXGxEhGW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDYaY+6NYdR1GOdLkRAtRbAKCtgOBjgMwpEyhakq3Tkwjs4t/YuwCfRneu FlO+gKU6+M5dOg6PvbD0ynE= =XZXG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5196445.pARXGxEhGW--