From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:07:10 +0000 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Sorry, dm:1.02, lvm2:2.02 did not work for me Message-ID: <20051112020710.GN26394@agk.surrey.redhat.com> References: <20051111163525.18AE1734B1@hormel.redhat.com> <1131758026.4975.77.camel@jgs4.ino.pvt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1131758026.4975.77.camel@jgs4.ino.pvt> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "James G. Sack (jim)" Cc: "LVM LIST linux-lvm@redhat.com" Please do (at the point of failure) dmsetup info -c dmsetup table Also, I need to see more of the log to work out what's going on and a copy of the metadata (/etc/lvm/backup/VGf11). Is the original LV activated with the old or new code? Alasdair