From: Heinz Mauelshagen <mauelshagen@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: hjm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm + raid (confused)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:48:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051130084846.GA2778@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efef33d20511292301s1fe5cf0dp90180833f51e2360@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:01:20AM +0100, Wallace Wadge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a hardware raid in place. I'd like to add snapshots via lvm to it
> but unfortunately the underlying filesystem is ext3 which cannot be resized
> downwards; therefore I would like to add another disk.
>
> Now for the problem:
>
> I would like to add a secondary (physical) disk to the mix and use it for
> snapshots only. However I do not want the lvm to stay writing to that disk
> for normal data since this seconday disk would not be part of my hardware
> raid. In other words, I wouldn't care if the snapshot drive failed because I
> would just replace it.
>
> Is this at all possible?
Hi Wallace,
yes, it is.
pvcreate the physical disk and vegextend your VG by it.
When creating snapshots, add the path to that PV (say /dev/sdc) to the lvcreate
command line:
lvcreate -LSnapshotSize -nSnapshotName /dev/YourVG/YourLV /dev/sdc
You need to make sure though, that spave for LVs you want to be resilient, gets
allocated on your HW RAID, rather than to the single drive PV.
There's 2 ways to achive that:
o add the path to your HW-RAID to all your lvcreate/lvextend commands
(but the ones to create snapshots)
o if your snapshots are short-term (which is typical), vgreduce the
VG by the single drive PV until you need to create (a) snapshot(s) again;
of course that solution falls short with respect to creating/extending
LVs *while* the PV is a member of your VG
>
> Thanks.
> Wallace
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Red Hat GmbH
Consulting Development Engineer Am Sonnenhang 11
Cluster and Storage Development 56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@RedHat.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-30 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 7:01 [linux-lvm] lvm + raid (confused) Wallace Wadge
2005-11-30 8:48 ` Heinz Mauelshagen [this message]
2005-11-30 9:08 ` [linux-lvm] " Wallace Wadge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051130084846.GA2778@redhat.com \
--to=mauelshagen@redhat.com \
--cc=hjm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).