From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBVEgC107213 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:42:12 -0500 Received: from snefru.openlib.org (wuecon195.wustl.edu.wustl.edu [128.252.177.195]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBVEgB9c008472 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:42:11 -0500 Received: from krichel by snefru.openlib.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EshwE-00025j-7l for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:42:30 -0600 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:42:30 -0600 From: Thomas Krichel Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] vg not intact after other disks are exchanged Message-ID: <20051231144230.GA8019@openlib.org> References: <20051230181808.GA15333@openlib.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051230181808.GA15333@openlib.org> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linux LVM Thomas Krichel writes > fasolt:~# pvscan > Couldn't find device with uuid 'N0i9f3-0xqW-iPyq-7EG9-e4kI-Oa3F-jPfRpC'. > Couldn't find device with uuid 'N0i9f3-0xqW-iPyq-7EG9-e4kI-Oa3F-jPfRpC'. > PV /dev/hdc VG vg1 lvm2 [186.30 GB / 0 free] > PV unknown device VG vg1 lvm2 [167.68 GB / 0 free] > PV /dev/hdb1 VG vg1 lvm2 [372.61 GB / 0 free] > Total: 3 [726.59 GB] / in use: 3 [726.59 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] > > But hdd is still there, it is just not recogized as > part of vg1. I have no response to my problem. I have been poking around more. Actually fasolt:~# pvdisplay /dev/hdd --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/hdd VG Name vg1 PV Size 167.68 GB / not usable 0 Allocatable yes (but full) PE Size (KByte) 4096 Total PE 42925 Free PE 0 Allocated PE 42925 PV UUID N0i9f3-0xqW-iPyq-7EG9-e4kI-Oa3F-jPfRpC This is exactly the sume uudi 'N0i9f3-0xqW-iPyq-7EG9-e4kI-Oa3F-jPfRpC'. that pvscan can not find. It is strange that the scan does not find the /dev/hdd volume, but the display manually finds the same data. If anyone wants to have a look I would be happy to have them access the machine. Cheers, Thomas Krichel mailto:krichel@openlib.org http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel