From: Heinz Mauelshagen <mauelshagen@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Difference in LVM and LVM2 and their strength/weakness
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:08:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060121170820.GA2797@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E8AFFEFDBE97C94E9297963F0527A07B423CE6@pmi00exf00.us.packetmotion.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 05:54:12PM -0800, Alex Chen wrote:
> Greetings,
Hi.
>
> I am tasked to investigate the differences between LVM and LVM2. I am
> new to LVM so it would be greatly appreciated if someone can explain or
> point me to the right direction for the following questions:
>
>
>
> 1. What does LVM2 have that is not available in LVM?
It has command line extensions beyond lvm (eg, vgs, lvs, pvs commands).
It's configurable in various regards (eg, device name filters)
The limits of 256 grand total logical volumes and ~64k extents per logical
volume are gone.
Logical volume snapshots are asynchronous rather than synchronuous
and gain better performance.
pvmove (online data relocation) is based on temporary, restartable mirrors
which wasn't the case in LVM1.
> Or is it a
> only better architectured implementation of LVM?
I'ld not say 'only', but yes, it is :)
> 2. Which version of Red Hat enterprise system uses which LVM? And
> does the user need to do any configuration during installation?
RHEL3 comes with LVM, RHEL4 with LVM2.
> 3. If LVM2 is definitely better than LVM, how stable is it?
It is stable with the exception of rare snapshot issues,
we're fixing right now.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Red Hat GmbH
Consulting Development Engineer Am Sonnenhang 11
Cluster and Storage Development 56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@RedHat.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-21 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-21 1:54 [linux-lvm] Difference in LVM and LVM2 and their strength/weakness Alex Chen
2006-01-21 17:08 ` Heinz Mauelshagen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-23 2:16 Alex Chen
2006-01-23 9:40 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-01-23 13:56 ` Karl O. Pinc
2006-01-23 19:23 Alex Chen
2006-01-23 21:23 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060121170820.GA2797@redhat.com \
--to=mauelshagen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).