* [linux-lvm] raidtools/mdadm stability
@ 2006-02-02 16:15 Don Shesnicky
2006-02-02 17:03 ` Andy Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Don Shesnicky @ 2006-02-02 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Couple of quick questions on raidtools/mdadm if anyone cares to comment:
1. In the raid faq it states "However, if you find raidtools cumbersome
or limited, mdadm (multiple devices admin) is an extremely useful tool
for running RAID systems. It can be used as a replacement for the
raidtools, or as a supplement." I want to mirror the root drives of a
RHEL4 ES U2 system, what's the prefered method for stability -
raidtools,
mdadm or mdadm with raidtools.
2. I take it from a previous posting I can mirror my two root drives,
installed the MBRs and be good to go to boot off either drive, that
the mirror is not at the bit level and does not include the MBR?
3. Is RHEL4 ES Update2 generally stable or is there something that
could burn us here?
Don
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] raidtools/mdadm stability
2006-02-02 16:15 [linux-lvm] raidtools/mdadm stability Don Shesnicky
@ 2006-02-02 17:03 ` Andy Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Smith @ 2006-02-02 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:15:52AM -0600, Don Shesnicky wrote:
> Couple of quick questions on raidtools/mdadm if anyone cares to comment:
>
> 1. In the raid faq it states "However, if you find raidtools cumbersome
> or limited, mdadm (multiple devices admin) is an extremely useful tool
> for running RAID systems. It can be used as a replacement for the
> raidtools, or as a supplement." I want to mirror the root drives of a
> RHEL4 ES U2 system, what's the prefered method for stability -
> raidtools,
> mdadm or mdadm with raidtools.
raidtools is obsolete, so mdadm.
> 2. I take it from a previous posting I can mirror my two root drives,
> installed the MBRs and be good to go to boot off either drive, that
> the mirror is not at the bit level and does not include the MBR?
The mirror is at the block device level, e.g. if your root fs is
/dev/sda1 then that's what you mirror. So you could install an MBR
on sda and sdb for example.
> 3. Is RHEL4 ES Update2 generally stable or is there something that
> could burn us here?
I have had no issues whatsoever with LVM or mdadm in RHEL3 or 4.
Apart from LVM snapshots, of course.
--
http://strugglers.net/wiki/Xen_hosting -- A Xen VPS hosting hobby
Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-02 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-02 16:15 [linux-lvm] raidtools/mdadm stability Don Shesnicky
2006-02-02 17:03 ` Andy Smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).