From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from agk.surrey.redhat.com (agk.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.74]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2ULx1vR005733 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:59:01 +0100 Received: from agk by agk.surrey.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FP5AT-0003DA-Dc for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:59:01 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:59:01 +0100 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: Boot Mgr support for '/boot' on LVM2 volumes ? Message-ID: <20060330215901.GL2690@agk.surrey.redhat.com> References: <6dcf0dbc0603050846k2b8bb546r1a3b6f30f541e473@mail.gmail.com> <20060307190636.GA12504@percy.comedia.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: LVM general discussion and development On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:31:41PM +0100, Claus F=EF=BF=BDrber wrote: > What about adding a "boot" flag to LVs? It set, it could have the=20 > following effect: =20 Well we already have --alloc contiguous which comes close. This would be a subset: contiguous and not striped etc., but could be mirrored to similarly-contiguous space. --alloc bootable perhaps. Alasdair --=20 agk@redhat.com