From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from agk.surrey.redhat.com (agk.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.74]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k35I3q0h021005 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:03:52 +0100 Received: from agk by agk.surrey.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FRCMC-00051Z-0i for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:03:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:03:51 +0100 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove to smaller PVs Message-ID: <20060405180351.GY4197@agk.surrey.redhat.com> References: <1144258458.32119.8.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> <20060405174425.GX4197@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <1144259900.32119.11.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1144259900.32119.11.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:58:19PM +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote: > However, is there a "canonical" way to check where PEs have been > allocated inside PVs? lvs -o+devices gives start PEs in parentheses Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com