linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Graham Wood <gwood@dragonhold.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] rescue data after hd crash
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:45:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060531124546.GF13142@dragonhold.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <optae062jz51dxvh@notebook_chl.intern>

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:34:04PM +0200, chris wrote:
> I have create a volume group with 4 250GByte harddisks with an ext3 file  
> system on the 1TB result.
Stripe or concat?

> now the third harddisk failed and the volume group is "dead" - obviously.
The way you created the volume had no redundancy - therefore 25% of your data is gone, as 
well as the volume's "completeness".

If you did a concat, then you (with playing) may be able to get some data back from the 
first 500GB of the volume - but I wouldn't want to rely on anything that came back from it.  
I'd suggest getting hold of 2 identical blank disks, and doing a binary (dd) copy of disks 1 
and 2 to them - and then work on them.  You might be able to use vgcfg{backup,restore} to 
tell the system that this volume is actually only on 2 disks....  However, anything that 
references data > 500GB into the volume is almost definitely lost - because although you've 
got 750G-1TB, it's almost all going to be linked back into the section that you've lost.

If you did a stripe, then you can forget getting any data back off it.  You've lost every 
4th block of whatever size you striped on.  E.g. with a 64k stripe size, you'll have lost 
from 128k-192k, 384k-448k, etc. - and there's almost definitely going to be nothing 
salvagable from that.

Graham

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-31 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-31 12:34 [linux-lvm] rescue data after hd crash chris
2006-05-31 12:45 ` Graham Wood [this message]
2006-05-31 21:31   ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-05-31 22:39     ` chris
2006-05-31 23:25       ` Heinz Mauelshagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-30 23:02 chris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060531124546.GF13142@dragonhold.org \
    --to=gwood@dragonhold.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).