From: Heinz Mauelshagen <mauelshagen@redhat.com>
To: morten@mortent.org,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:40:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060920114019.GA4796@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45111CDA.6080406@mortent.org>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:50:02PM +0200, Morten Torstensen wrote:
> Scott Lamb wrote:
> >This is my biggest beef with LVM - why doesn't *any* of the
> >documentation point this out? There are very few good reasons to use LVM
> >without RAID, and "ignorance" certainly isn't among them. I don't see
> >any mention of RAID or disk failures in the manual pages or in the HOWTO.
>
> Mirroring should be dealt with in LVM itself, by mapping more PEs on
> physical seperate PVs to each LE. From the little information I've seen
> about the new LVM mirroring, it seems that the mirrors are defined on LV
> level instead of LE/PE. But after some JFGI sessions nothing really
> enlightening has shown up.
LVM2 does mirror by grouping multiple (hidden) logical volumes
into a mirror set.
>
> --
>
> //Morten Torstensen
> //Email: morten@mortent.org
> //IM: Cartoon@jabber.no morten.torstensen@gmail.com
>
> And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil.
> The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Red Hat GmbH
Consulting Development Engineer Am Sonnenhang 11
Storage Development 56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@RedHat.com PHONE +49 171 7803392
FAX +49 2626 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-20 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-18 18:10 [linux-lvm] HDD Failure Nick
2006-09-18 19:08 ` Mitch Miller
2006-09-18 19:13 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:23 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-18 19:34 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:37 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-19 22:40 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation (was: HDD Failure) Scott Lamb
2006-09-20 0:35 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 3:22 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-20 11:27 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 19:45 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation Barnaby Claydon
2006-09-20 10:50 ` Morten Torstensen
2006-09-20 11:40 ` Heinz Mauelshagen [this message]
2006-09-20 12:41 ` Les Mikesell
2006-09-21 9:42 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-09-21 12:52 ` Les Mikesell
2006-09-20 13:22 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation (was: HDD Failure) Tobias Bluhm
2006-09-20 23:21 ` Scott Lamb
2006-09-18 19:42 ` [linux-lvm] HDD Failure Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-18 19:52 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:57 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-19 21:53 ` [linux-lvm] LVM on RAID Alexander Lazarevich
2006-09-19 22:03 ` Roger Lucas
2006-09-24 17:19 ` Nix
2006-09-19 22:04 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-19 22:11 ` Michael Loftis
2006-09-20 0:30 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 13:55 ` Matthew B. Brookover
2006-09-20 14:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2006-09-20 14:48 ` Alexander Lazarevich
2006-09-20 15:57 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-21 3:19 ` Andrew Boyko
2006-09-20 17:24 ` Mark H. Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060920114019.GA4796@redhat.com \
--to=mauelshagen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=morten@mortent.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).