From: Brian McCullough <bdmc@bdmcc-us.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Missing VGs?
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:26:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061014182619.GA25852@bdmcc-us.com> (raw)
Folks,
I have a drive with two "Linux raid autodetect" partitions, which, as
far as I know, have LVM VGs on them.
However, even though mdadm happily starts both RAID devices ( each half
of a RAID-1 device ), vgscan and pvscan don't give me answers that I
really understand.
First pvscan -vvv ( edited output ):
Processing: pvscan -vvv
O_DIRECT will be used
Setting global/locking_type to 1
Setting global/locking_dir to /var/lock/lvm
File-based locking enabled.
Wiping cache of LVM-capable devices
/dev/acpi: Not a block device
/dev/adsp: Not a block device
.
.
.
/dev/hda5: No label detected
Closed /dev/hda5
Opened /dev/md5 RO
/dev/md5: size is 78139904 sectors
Closed /dev/md5
/dev/md5: size is 78139904 sectors
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Using /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md5: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md5
lvmcache: /dev/md5 now orphaned
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/Ubuntu/lv_usrsrc RO
.
.
.
Closed /dev/hda6
lvmcache: /dev/hda6 now in VG Ubuntu
Opened /dev/md6 RO
/dev/md6: size is 312576512 sectors
Closed /dev/md6
/dev/md6: size is 312576512 sectors
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md6
Using /dev/md6
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md6: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md6
lvmcache: /dev/md6 now orphaned
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md6
Opened /dev/Ubuntu/lv_home RO
/dev/Ubuntu/lv_home: size is 4710400 sectors
.
.
.
/dev/hda6 9: 3516 62: NULL(0:0)
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md5: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md5: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md6: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md6
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md6
.
.
.
PV /dev/hda6 VG Ubuntu lvm2 [13.98 GB / 2.58 GB free]
PV /dev/md5 lvm2 [37.26 GB]
PV /dev/md6 lvm2 [149.05 GB]
Total: 7 [372.62 GB] / in use: 5 [186.31 GB] / in no VG: 2 [186.31 GB]
And then, vgscan -vvv said ( also edited ):
Processing: vgscan -vvv
O_DIRECT will be used
Setting global/locking_type to 1
Setting global/locking_dir to /var/lock/lvm
File-based locking enabled.
Wiping cache of LVM-capable devices
/dev/acpi: Not a block device
.
.
.
/dev/hda5: No label detected
Closed /dev/hda5
Opened /dev/md5 RO
/dev/md5: size is 78139904 sectors
Closed /dev/md5
/dev/md5: size is 78139904 sectors
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Using /dev/md5
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md5: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md5
lvmcache: /dev/md5 now orphaned
Opened /dev/md5 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md5: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md5
Opened /dev/Ubuntu/lv_usrsrc RO
.
.
.
Closed /dev/hda6
lvmcache: /dev/hda6 now in VG Ubuntu
Opened /dev/md6 RO
/dev/md6: size is 312576512 sectors
Closed /dev/md6
/dev/md6: size is 312576512 sectors
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md6
Using /dev/md6
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
/dev/md6: lvm2 label detected
Closed /dev/md6
lvmcache: /dev/md6 now orphaned
Opened /dev/md6 RO O_DIRECT
/dev/md6: block size is 4096 bytes
Closed /dev/md6
Opened /dev/Ubuntu/lv_home RO
.
.
.
And nothing more about the supposed VGs on those partitions.
What should I try next?
Thanks,
Brian
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-14 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-14 18:26 Brian McCullough [this message]
2006-10-14 18:44 ` [linux-lvm] Missing VGs? Brian McCullough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-17 22:13 Brian McCullough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061014182619.GA25852@bdmcc-us.com \
--to=bdmc@bdmcc-us.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).