From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kADCJAHH025966 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:19:10 -0500 Received: from enterprise.homenet (cust.12.220.adsl.cistron.nl [62.216.12.220]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kADCJ7EP009723 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:19:07 -0500 Received: from ferengi.homenet (unknown [172.16.16.11]) by enterprise.homenet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0686D2 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:14:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:19:00 +0100 From: Fred Donck Message-ID: <20061113121900.GK276@dogbert> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM upgrade Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com *, I am in the process of upgrading my Gentoo system and all that is stgill to be done is LVM2 My current install is the following host ~ # lvm version LVM version: 2.01.09 (2005-04-04) Library version: 1.01.00-ioctl (2005-01-17) Driver version: 4.4.0 host ~ # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 1003932 64952 938980 7% / /dev/vg/usr 10485436 3729092 6756344 36% /usr /dev/vg/var 10485436 636380 9849056 7% /var /dev/vg/tmp 4194172 494092 3700080 12% /tmp /dev/vg/opt 4194172 35928 4158244 1% /opt /dev/vg/home 4194172 3041392 1152780 73% /home none 248632 0 248632 0% /dev/shm host ~ # The latest Gentoo version for LVM2 is host ~ # emerge -p lvm2 These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] sys-fs/device-mapper-1.02.10-r1 [1.01.00] USE="(-selinux)" [ebuild U ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.06 [2.01.09] USE="-clvm% -cman% -gulm% -nolvm1% -nomirrors% -nosnapshots% (-selinux)" host ~ # Are there any problems i could expect when upgrading? Especially in the volume names or in the mapping of volume name to device name for /etc/fstab. Thanks in advance -- Fred Doubt is an uncomfortable situation, but certainty is an absurd one -- Voltaire