From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l25JGw9h016032 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:16:58 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l25JGg3e000524 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:16:45 -0500 From: "Cisco" Subject: AW: [linux-lvm] WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config node: filter (seeking filter) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:16:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <45EC5F32.1060100@davidb.org> Message-Id: <20070305191635.75F0E7576E@mailer.at.ds9> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: cisco66@gmx.de, LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: 'David Brown' , 'LVM general discussion and development' Hi Dave, thanks a lot ! It worked by consolidating the "filter" lines into one single line containing all filter statements. filter = [ "a/.*/", "r|/dev/cdrom|", "r|/dev/hda|", "r|/dev/hdb|", "r|/cdrom|" ] Tom > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: David Brown [mailto:lvm@davidb.org] > Gesendet: Montag, 5. M�rz 2007 19:20 > An: cisco66@gmx.de; LVM general discussion and development > Betreff: Re: [linux-lvm] WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config > node: filter (seeking filter) > > Cisco wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > after upgrading (compiling from source)LVM2 and device mapper, i > > always get the warning message "WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config > > node: filter (seeking filter)" when doing "lvm version" or > any other > > lvm command. > > > > Does anyone know what's going on and if i should be > concerned about > > this, or even better: What is the meaning of this message > and how can > > i get rid of it. > > You have multiple "filter = " lines in your lvm config file. > Previous versions ignored this (but appeared to only use one > of them). You need to specify all of the filtering you want > in one list. > > Dave >