From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7226O4X007596 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 22:06:29 -0400 Received: from dubh.id.au ([202.45.122.140]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7226KG0002903 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 22:06:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:06:17 +0800 From: Nigel Duff Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Missing logical volume Message-ID: <20070802020617.GA6873@dubh.id.au> References: <20070801072738.GA9466@dubh.id.au> <366C0458-4DED-43B6-B639-99252B03BAA3@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <366C0458-4DED-43B6-B639-99252B03BAA3@redhat.com> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development Hi, On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:14:28AM -0500, Jonathan Brassow wrote: > > I think you need to figure out what happened to the missing disk. If > that's gone, so is your data. Nothing you've described so far has > given me reason to believe the drive shouldn't be there. So, I'm > assuming device failure... I was thinking that LVM could handle the loss of a drive without losing the whole volume. The fact that pvscan was showing all the drives still belonging to the volume group was throwing me. Thanks for the help, Nigel