From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"ATARAID (eg, Promise Fasttrak,
Highpoint 370) related discussions" <ataraid-list@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:50:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:19:59PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>I am investigating a bug report involving the combination of lvm and
>dmraid, and it seems to me that the problem is that lvm is detecting the
>underlying partition on the primary disk and accessing it directly
>rather than going through the raid device made by dmraid. I think that
>the problem is there is no facility for dmraid to "claim" the physical
>disk so that lvm does not look at it, and also to have lvm scan the raid
>device for physical volumes.
>
>Does anyone have any thoughts on how this might be accomplished?
Two things come to mind
1) dmraid should use ioctl BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION, to clean up any eventual
partition table on component devices
2) lvm tool filter could be modified to check if a device has been
already claimed by device-mapper.
something along the lines of:
ioctl DM_LIST_DEVICES
while (...)
ioctl DM_TABLE_DEPS
the above would probably require a cache.
i believe that manual use of partx or lvm filters is sub-optimal
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-02 6:50 ` Luca Berra [this message]
2007-08-02 10:45 ` [linux-lvm] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage Bryn M. Reeves
2007-08-03 7:55 ` Luca Berra
[not found] ` <46B251BB.1010004@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-03 0:40 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " David Robinson
2007-08-07 21:37 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:03 ` Alasdair G Kergon
[not found] ` <46BA2FCC.1040001@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-08 21:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
[not found] ` <46BB4E86.7090000@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-10 5:09 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-10 13:49 ` Alasdair G Kergon
[not found] ` <46B254E4.60700@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-03 8:11 ` Luca Berra
[not found] ` <46B36F7A.2090601@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-03 19:57 ` Luca Berra
[not found] ` <46B39E58.2040305@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-04 6:50 ` Luca Berra
[not found] ` <46B733EE.4090507@cfl.rr.com>
2007-08-07 9:17 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-07 22:01 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:40 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:28 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:02 ` Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it \
--to=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=ataraid-list@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).