From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:02:02 +0100
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070807210202.GZ2064@agk.fab.redhat.com>
References: <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com>
	<20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it>
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>, "ATARAID (eg, Promise Fasttrak,
	Highpoint 370) related discussions" <ataraid-list@redhat.com>, linux-lvm@redhat.com

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:50:12AM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
> 2) lvm tool filter could be modified to check if a device has been
> already claimed by device-mapper.
> something along the lines of:
> ioctl DM_LIST_DEVICES
> while (...)
>  ioctl DM_TABLE_DEPS

There are already some checks in the code, but they are have not been completed.

But a dm device should already take precedence over a scsi device.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com