From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:37:14 +0100 From: Alasdair G Kergon Message-ID: <20070807213714.GD2064@agk.fab.redhat.com> References: <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com> <20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it> <46B1B5E1.1050406@redhat.com> <46B251BB.1010004@cfl.rr.com> <46B2798D.8000902@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B2798D.8000902@gmail.com> Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: device-mapper development , "ATARAID (eg, Promise Fasttrak, Highpoint 370) related discussions" , linux-lvm@redhat.com On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:40:45AM +1000, David Robinson wrote: > If you need LVM to only scan certain devices you should modify the > filter line in lvm.conf. Yes, this is the current approach: a well-configured system would be actively modifying the filters (with the help of udev) both on boot and if device configurations change subsequently. Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com