From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from agk.fab.redhat.com (agk.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.19]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1DErdrM021222 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:53:39 -0500 Received: from agk by agk.fab.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1JPIzT-0005Rn-5S for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:53:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:53:39 +0000 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 tools lvmcmdline.c major and minor number limits Message-ID: <20080213145338.GS29914@agk.fab.redhat.com> References: <1202900520.4345.115.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080213121530.GQ29914@agk.fab.redhat.com> <1202909763.4345.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1202909763.4345.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:36:03PM +0000, Darren Lavender wrote: > I think the interest is _only_ in the minor number but I noticed that I > had to specify --major at the command line or I received an error: The validation probably broke at some stage. One day someone might port the multiple major number support from 2.4 to 2.6, but there doesn't seem to be any demand for it. Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com