From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1PNkeSQ016632 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:46:40 -0500 Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.174]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1PNk8nq008408 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:46:09 -0500 Received: from laptop1.local (ip136.133.dsl-acs2.pdx.iinet.com [209.20.133.136]) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAE86A7BF for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:45:37 -0800 (PST) From: ben scott Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:45:32 -0800 References: <269300.77497.qm@web57704.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <200802162126.09898.benscott@nwlink.com> In-Reply-To: <200802162126.09898.benscott@nwlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802251545.33199.benscott@nwlink.com> Subject: [linux-lvm] Has anyone tried kvpm? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com I see several people have dowloaded kvpm from sourceforge. Has anyone tried it? Don't be afraid to say it sucks, just tell me why. :-)