From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4LEt9WZ012140 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:55:09 -0400 Received: from jugis.itk.ppke.hu (jugis.itk.ppke.hu [193.225.109.42]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LEssaP010212 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:54:54 -0400 Received: from jugis (jugis [127.0.0.1]) by checked.jugis.itk.ppke.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD80D210418 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rivendell (rivendell.itk.ppke.hu [193.225.109.193]) by jugis.itk.ppke.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B141F1669 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:54:39 +0200 From: Csillag Tamas Message-ID: <20080521145439.GH3610@digitus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [linux-lvm] recovering with missing PV -s Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Dear lvm list, We have a DS4700 disk storage system which exports 9 LUNs to a given machine each one is 1.5TB (because it has 2TB limit on each). One VG is created from this 9 PV without striping and one LV is built on it. The filesystem is reiserfs3. Two days ago one eclosure has failed. 3 PVs out of 9 are missing. The space usage was about 10%. Is there a way to recover from this failure with LVM? Thanks in advance. Regards, cstamas -- CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas Pazmany Peter Catholic University The Faculty of Information Technology When hitting yourself on the head with a hammer starts to give you headaches, the solution is not to put padding on the hammer.