From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8GLwEZ4017537 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:58:14 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8GLw0BA002599 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:58:01 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8GLw0a3030368 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:58:00 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m8GLw0e3168490 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:58:00 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m8GLw03d024871 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:58:00 -0600 Received: from malahal.localdomain (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8GLvxT6024865 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:58:00 -0600 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:57:59 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Mirrored LV Message-ID: <20080916215759.GA11670@us.ibm.com> References: <1221592827.6037.57.camel@localhost> <20080916204241.GA9810@us.ibm.com> <1221599565.6037.82.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1221599565.6037.82.camel@localhost> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Koen Vermeer [koen@vermeer.tv] wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you're statements are about when the > 'other device' is failing. Is this right? If so, then the log should > normally show that everything is synced. In that case, it's not of much > use in normal operation. Now, when one disk fails, I need to replace it, > and rebuild the mirror. So again, I don't need it, because I have to > copy everything anyway. Only when a disk is temporarily gone, it may be > of some use. Does this make sense? Yes, it makes sense for temporarily gone devices. Otherwise use corelog for your lvcreate command and you should be able to create mirrored LV.