From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6G3hSww015731 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:43:28 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6G3hCeO010784 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:43:12 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6G3eqFS021994 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:40:52 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6G3h8O3214284 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:43:08 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6G3h78A003492 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:43:07 -0600 Received: from malahal.localdomain (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6G3h7KJ003483 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:43:07 -0600 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:43:06 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] multipath works; lvm on multipath does not Message-ID: <20090716034306.GA3285@us.ibm.com> References: <21354387.222841247696527230.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <1247699245.9792.31.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <20090715232638.GA29350@us.ibm.com> <4A5E74A0.5040902@anl.gov> <20090716005322.GA31324@us.ibm.com> <4A5E978B.1070403@anl.gov> <4A5E9A1E.1040705@anl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A5E9A1E.1040705@anl.gov> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Brian Elliott Finley [finley@anl.gov] wrote: > Malahal, > > I took a look inside the initrd to see what it might be doing to > contribute to this. What I see is the following: > > ./etc/udev/rules.d/85-lvm2.rules > ./etc/udev/rules.d/95-multipath.rules > > Looks like a vgscan is being done inside the initrd (without an lvm.conf > file) before multipath is setup. Could that be the cause? Yes, yes! Also, you *should* see some failures from multipath command as it will fail to grab one of the paths...