From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.7]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8MG8BO3021429 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8MG7w18017722 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:07:58 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8MG6x7F016369 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:07:00 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8MG7qGS180318 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:07:52 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n8MG7pf3032650 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:07:51 -0600 Received: from malahal.localdomain (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8MG7oJs032585 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:07:51 -0600 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:07:50 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] I've tried to get some support on this list about lvm Message-ID: <20090922160750.GA12265@us.ibm.com> References: <200909152137.44474.whobedobe@dodo.com.au> <200909172059.49369.whobedobe@dodo.com.au> <4AB88C0B.6020203@redhat.com> <200909222318.17782.whobedobe@dodo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909222318.17782.whobedobe@dodo.com.au> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hugh [whobedobe@dodo.com.au] wrote: > Any idea how to resize sdb2? It's lvm and maybe I could delete it and > recreate it with fdisk but maybe it will break and everything will be > lost. > > Hugh You should be able to use fdisk to delete the partition first and then create a new one with bigger size. MAKE SURE that the new partition's start sector is same as the old one. Thanks, Malahal.