From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.8]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9R0KNpK030123 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:20:23 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com (e9.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.139]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9R0KAvh011649 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:20:10 -0400 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9R0Fqu7030379 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:15:52 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9R0K9NS1224950 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:20:09 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9R0K8K1023310 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:20:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:20:08 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Removing a very old physical drive Message-ID: <20091027002008.GA1106@us.ibm.com> References: <7vgn6o$494l6v@smtpout.karoo.kcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vgn6o$494l6v@smtpout.karoo.kcom.com> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: postmaster@bottlehall.eclipse.co.uk Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com postmaster@bottlehall.eclipse.co.uk [postmaster@bottlehall.eclipse.co.uk] wrote: > Fixed it! > > Rummaging around with dmsetup, I discovered that lvm wasn't making the > pvmove lv active - it was suspended. It seems everything trying to run > against it was waiting for it to unsuspend. Using dmsetup to resume it > then meant that pvmove --abort worked and then a normal re-boot followed. That is good to know! Thanks, Malahal.