linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: malahal@us.ibm.com
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Removing a very old physical drive - revisited
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:04:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091030020459.GB11054@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256867309.4231.16.camel@elm.bottlehall.co.uk>

Nicholas Robinson [npr@bottlehall.co.uk] wrote:
> Hi Malahal
> 
> In the absence of fixing the underlying problem, I've renamed the
> volgroup and removed the 30GB disc that was the original aim of the
> exercise! I thought I was getting somewhere, but now the server won't
> boot by itself, I have to use a rescue disc and then chroot and start
> the critical services manually. It is something to do with the change in
> device name from /dev/sda to /dev/sdc, but I can't see why. It gets to
> the point where it should be trying to mount the volgroup and then hangs
> without any diagnostic. Everything looks okay in /etc/fstab.
> 
> I am confused about grub.conf as the (hd0,0) is wrong, given that
> device.map lists /dev/sdc as hd1, but swapping grub.conf to specify
> hd1,0 to match device.map fails with invalid disc or similar and using
> map (...) statements to swap them over or changing device.map don't work
> either.

(hd0,0) is the first partition on the first disk found by your BIOS. It
maybe slightly different from how the OS sees the disks. Device.map is
generated by BIOS but it never uses it as far as I know. You can run
'grub' from shell and find out which disk has the 'boot' code.

> I always used to think the biggest advantage of linux over windows was
> that when it failed it told you why. It hasn't been too helpful in
> recent days.

The software tries to tell you why it failed if it failed. You seem to
be getting into a hang here and it is harder for the software to tell
you what went wrong. You have the option of changing the source code and
instrumenting in Linux if you know what to do. :-(

> I think I will copy everything off the disc tomorrow, reinstall fedora
> 11 on it from scratch (having removed the usb drive!!!) and then
> restore. Life's too short.

I agree.

      reply	other threads:[~2009-10-30  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-27 17:27 [linux-lvm] Removing a very old physical drive - revisited Nicholas Robinson
2009-10-28  1:29 ` malahal
2009-10-28  7:17   ` Nicholas Robinson
2009-10-28 16:07     ` malahal
2009-10-28 23:21       ` Nicholas Robinson
2009-10-29  4:01         ` Nicholas Robinson
2009-10-29 19:04           ` malahal
2009-10-30  1:48             ` Nicholas Robinson
2009-10-30  2:04               ` malahal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091030020459.GB11054@us.ibm.com \
    --to=malahal@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).