From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.13]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5Jqart011379 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:52:36 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5JqN2M003636 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:52:23 -0500 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nA5JoD7u016980 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:50:13 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nA5JqIn4106812 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:52:18 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nA5DnIEp003495 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:49:19 -0700 Received: from malahal.localdomain (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id nA5DnIMY003465 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:49:18 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:52:17 -0800 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] PFree is 0 on a drive with nothing on it Message-ID: <20091105195217.GA20934@us.ibm.com> References: <1257433818.17792.30@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> <1257436528.17792.32@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> <896EDE05-E939-4C70-9513-5805DB864BD4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Stuart D. Gathman [stuart@bmsi.com] wrote: > If you want an integrated LVM/filesystem, then you should look > at OpenSolaris and ZFS. There are some advantages to this approach, > but it does mean that you have only one filesystem choice. BTRFS is planning on doing similar things, in case you are not planning on jumping to Solaris yet. Stuart is right, you will be restricted to a single file system though.