From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from agk-dp.fab.redhat.com (agk-dp.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.20]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1AEMKVa005766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:22:21 -0500 Received: from agk by agk-dp.fab.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfDSU-00020x-9D for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:22:26 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:22:26 +0000 From: Alasdair G Kergon Message-ID: <20100210142226.GF18505@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> References: <1265793636.27966.3@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> <4B72BAF5.9090005@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B72BAF5.9090005@tlinx.org> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvextend docmentation vs. implementation (lvm2-2.02.39), Suse-11.1 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 05:56:05AM -0800, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Sorry -- I was using it with capital "L" not lower case...didn't know > there were two separate switches... my bad. > thanks, The implementation of the feature turned out simpler with -l than with -L. (Because sizes supplied with -L require conversion to 'natural units' of extents which may involve rounding.) Alasdair