From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.6]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB1EDBeY014935 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:13:12 -0500 Received: from mail09.linbit.com (mail09.linbit.com [212.69.161.110]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB1ECxgm021853 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:13:00 -0500 Received: from soda.linbit (unknown [10.9.9.55]) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 5202510587C1 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:12:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:12:59 +0100 From: Lars Ellenberg Message-ID: <20101201141259.GA17090@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [SOLVED]: lvm2 and partition shringkin: superblock/filesystem size mismatch Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Johannes Graumann wrote: > And yes, by that I set the truncation of the FS (thanks, Lars for pointing > that out) in stone ... Soo... did the fsck you ran immediately after the mke2fs -S complain, or did you get away with no more than a fright? Lars