linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Cc: cedric.lemarchand@ixblue.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Different PV on the same raid array
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:04:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224070435.5b057008@bettercgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D66382E.4090906@ixcore.com>

> To bypass the DOS MBR 2TB limits, i plan to use LVM to create on the
> same raid array some "small" PV (< 2TB)  that will be in the same big
> VG (> 2TB).
> 
> First, am i planning ugly thing ? is the GPT alternative a better
> way ?

   If you're not booting from the array, just make the array 
the PV.  Once you're past the BIOS boot, there's little reason
to have partitions at all since you're using LVM to divide the 
storage into appropriate volumes.  If you are booting from it
and therefore need partitions, GPT is the new standard for 
partitions.

> i would like that LVM use 1 PV first and then
> the second when the first come full  (not both at the same time).
> Maybe LVM do that by default, or do i need some option ? (i saw
> "--contiguous" in the lvcreate man pages, but dont know exactly what
> this option does ... )

  I think it does that by default, subject to certain other contraints
such as not putting both halves of a mirrored LV on the same PV.
-- 
Ray Morris
support@bettercgi.com

Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/

Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control
http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/

Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program:
http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php




On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:51:26 +0100
Cédric Lemarchand <cedric.lemarchand@ixcore.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> To bypass the DOS MBR 2TB limits, i plan to use LVM to create on the
> same raid array some "small" PV (< 2TB)  that will be in the same big
> VG (> 2TB).
> 
> First, am i planning ugly thing ? is the GPT alternative a better
> way ?
> 
> Secondly, I dont know how LVM use PVs within a VG, but for
> performances issues, i would like that LVM use 1 PV first and then
> the second when the first come full  (not both at the same time).
> Maybe LVM do that by default, or do i need some option ? (i saw
> "--contiguous" in the lvcreate man pages, but dont know exactly what
> this option does ... )
> 
> 
> Thx
> 
> Cédric
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 10:51 [linux-lvm] Different PV on the same raid array Cédric Lemarchand
2011-02-24 13:04 ` Ray Morris [this message]
2011-02-24 13:44   ` Cédric Lemarchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110224070435.5b057008@bettercgi.com \
    --to=support@bettercgi.com \
    --cc=cedric.lemarchand@ixblue.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).