From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx13.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.18]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1OD59Tg018048 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:05:09 -0500 Received: from ps536.phatservers.com (ps536.phatservers.com [216.17.105.202]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1OD50Em032141 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:05:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:04:35 -0600 From: Ray Morris Message-ID: <20110224070435.5b057008@bettercgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4D66382E.4090906@ixcore.com> References: <4D66382E.4090906@ixcore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Different PV on the same raid array Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: cedric.lemarchand@ixblue.com > To bypass the DOS MBR 2TB limits, i plan to use LVM to create on the > same raid array some "small" PV (< 2TB) that will be in the same big > VG (> 2TB). > > First, am i planning ugly thing ? is the GPT alternative a better > way ? If you're not booting from the array, just make the array the PV. Once you're past the BIOS boot, there's little reason to have partitions at all since you're using LVM to divide the storage into appropriate volumes. If you are booting from it and therefore need partitions, GPT is the new standard for partitions. > i would like that LVM use 1 PV first and then > the second when the first come full (not both at the same time). > Maybe LVM do that by default, or do i need some option ? (i saw > "--contiguous" in the lvcreate man pages, but dont know exactly what > this option does ... ) I think it does that by default, subject to certain other contraints such as not putting both halves of a mirrored LV on the same PV. -- Ray Morris support@bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security: http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/ Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/ Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program: http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:51:26 +0100 Cédric Lemarchand wrote: > Hello, > > To bypass the DOS MBR 2TB limits, i plan to use LVM to create on the > same raid array some "small" PV (< 2TB) that will be in the same big > VG (> 2TB). > > First, am i planning ugly thing ? is the GPT alternative a better > way ? > > Secondly, I dont know how LVM use PVs within a VG, but for > performances issues, i would like that LVM use 1 PV first and then > the second when the first come full (not both at the same time). > Maybe LVM do that by default, or do i need some option ? (i saw > "--contiguous" in the lvcreate man pages, but dont know exactly what > this option does ... ) > > > Thx > > Cédric > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/