From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:33:44 +0200 From: Karel Zak Message-ID: <20110505083344.GA1114@nb.net.home> References: <20110429122454.GL32370@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <20110502081308.GC8642@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <20110502081925.GA11312@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [dm-devel] do not disable ext4 discards on first discard failure? [was: Re: dm snapshot: ignore discards issued to the snapshot-origin target] Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer , Christoph Hellwig , device-mapper development , DarkNovaNick@gmail.com, linux-lvm@redhat.com, Lukas Czerner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:16:05AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Lukas" == Lukas Czerner writes: > > I got tired of poking around in sysfs to find the discard topology. > Here's a patch against lsblk that adds a -D option to present this > information in a human-readable form: Applied, thanks. > # lsblk -D > NAME DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO > sda 0 0B 0B 0 > └─sda1 0 0B 0B 0 > sdb 0 512B 2G 1 > └─sdb1 0 512B 2G 1 I have a question, 2.6.35 on my ThinkPad, non-SSD disk: NAME DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO sda 0 0B 0B 0 ├─sda1 4294935040 0B 0B 0 ├─sda2 4188038656 0B 0B 0 ├─sda3 1346205184 0B 0B 0 ├─sda4 3231165440 0B 0B 0 ├─sda5 4188006400 0B 0B 0 │ └─kzak-home (dm-0) 0 0B 0B 0 └─sda6 2035725312 0B 0B 0 Does is make sense? The DISC-ALN is non-zero but DISC-GRAN is zero. Note that cat /sys/block/sda/sda*/discard_alignment returns the same numbers. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com